Ad disclosureAffiliate links on this page. Compensation does not affect scores or the winner of any row. Methodology →

Divvy.Bet vs Alpha Arcade

Generated from the same platform records as our written comparisons — the figures are the ones in each review. We have not published an editorial verdict on this combination, so this view carries no ranking of our own and stays out of search results.

Divvy.Bet

Crypto, on-chain · SOL

— out of 10, editor score

UnavailableRead the Divvy.Bet review

Alpha Arcade

Crypto, on-chain · USDC

5.1 out of 10, editor score

  • 7 market categories
  • Public API
AvailableRead the Alpha Arcade review

Row by row

The edge on each row is marked. Rows that describe rather than rank — jurisdiction, currencies, market categories — say “no edge” instead of picking a side.

Divvy.Bet, Alpha Arcade compared row by row, with the better value marked on each row.
CriterionDivvy.BetAlpha ArcadeEdge
Overview
Editor ScoreNot rated5.1/10No edge
TypeCrypto / on-chainCrypto / on-chainNo edge
Launched——No edge
Mobile apps——No edge
Fees
Fee conditions & evidenceFee conditions have not been verified. Review evidenceTaker-only fee = 0.07 × quantity × price × (1 − price); makers pay nothing (e.g. one contract at $0.50 costs $0.0175). Fees collected on-chain (Terms of Use). Review evidence · Official fee sourceDepends on the trade
Maker feeNot verifiedSee fee conditions aboveNo edge
Taker feeNot verifiedSee fee conditions aboveNo edge
Withdrawal fee——No edge
Deposits and withdrawals
Minimum deposit——No edge
CurrenciesSOLUSDCNo edge
Markets
Market categoriesSports, CryptoSports, Politics, Crypto, Economy, Entertainment, Science, OtherNo edge
Public API—YesNo edge
Access and regulation
Jurisdiction——No edge
Licensing——No edge
KYC required——No edge
KYC trigger——No edge
Supported countries——No edge