Ad disclosureAffiliate links on this page. Compensation does not affect scores or the winner of any row. Methodology →

Divvy.Bet vs Worm

Generated from the same platform records as our written comparisons — the figures are the ones in each review. We have not published an editorial verdict on this combination, so this view carries no ranking of our own and stays out of search results.

Divvy.Bet

Crypto, on-chain · SOL

— out of 10, editor score

UnavailableRead the Divvy.Bet review

Worm

Crypto, on-chain · USDC

3.3 out of 10, editor score

  • Public API
Availability unverifiedRead the Worm review

Row by row

The edge on each row is marked. Rows that describe rather than rank — jurisdiction, currencies, market categories — say “no edge” instead of picking a side.

Divvy.Bet, Worm compared row by row, with the better value marked on each row.
CriterionDivvy.BetWormEdge
Overview
Editor ScoreNot rated3.3/10No edge
TypeCrypto / on-chainCrypto / on-chainNo edge
Launched——No edge
Mobile apps——No edge
Fees
Fee conditions & evidenceFee conditions have not been verified. Review evidenceLeveraged positions pay a closing fee only when you win or are liquidated; trading fees on user-created markets are split 50/50 with the creator (rates not stated) (https://docs.worm.wtf/faq/hot-questions/leveraged-fees). Review evidence · Official fee sourceDepends on the trade
Maker feeNot verifiedSee fee conditions aboveNo edge
Taker feeNot verifiedSee fee conditions aboveNo edge
Withdrawal fee——No edge
Deposits and withdrawals
Minimum deposit——No edge
CurrenciesSOLUSDCNo edge
Markets
Market categoriesSports, CryptoSports, Crypto, OtherNo edge
Public API—YesNo edge
Access and regulation
Jurisdiction——No edge
Licensing——No edge
KYC required——No edge
KYC trigger——No edge
Supported countries——No edge