Ad disclosureAffiliate links on this page. Compensation does not affect scores or the winner of any row. Methodology →
MagicMarkets vs Futuur
Generated from the same platform records as our written comparisons — the figures are the ones in each review. We have not published an editorial verdict on this combination, so this view carries no ranking of our own and stays out of search results.
MagicMarkets
Custodial, unregulated
4.9 out of 10, editor score
Futuur
Custodial, unregulated · USDC, USDT
5.2 out of 10, editor score
- +Public API
Row by row
The edge on each row is marked. Rows that describe rather than rank — jurisdiction, currencies, market categories — say “no edge” instead of picking a side.
| Criterion | MagicMarkets | Futuur | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overview | |||
| Editor Score | 4.9/10 | 5.2/10 | Futuur |
| Type | Custodial, unregulated | Custodial, unregulated | No edge |
| Launched | — | — | No edge |
| Mobile apps | — | — | No edge |
| Fees | |||
| Fee conditions & evidence | "Zero commission. No fees, no cuts"; nothing charged on deposits or withdrawals, though third-party onramp/network fees may apply (homepage FAQ). Review evidence · Official fee source | Fee conditions have not been verified. Review evidence · Official fee source | Depends on the trade |
| Maker fee | See fee conditions above | Not verified | No edge |
| Taker fee | See fee conditions above | Not verified | No edge |
| Withdrawal fee | — | — | No edge |
| Deposits and withdrawals | |||
| Minimum deposit | — | — | No edge |
| Currencies | — | USDC, USDT, USD, OOM (play money) | No edge |
| Markets | |||
| Market categories | Sports, Politics, Other | — | No edge |
| Public API | — | Yes | No edge |
| Access and regulation | |||
| Jurisdiction | — | — | No edge |
| Licensing | — | — | No edge |
| KYC required | — | — | No edge |
| KYC trigger | Registration required; ToS 7.1.7 lets the operator verify identity via third parties at its discretion. | — | No edge |
| Supported countries | — | — | No edge |